Bigness Group Case Study

Zylaris Case Snapshot

1. CONTEXT (Who / Situation)

Case: London-based construction and property services company repositioning for credibility and scale.

2. THE TENSION (Why they came)

“The business was active, but trust, visibility, and structure were not working together.”

Bigness Group had operational capability, but:

• its digital presence lacked clarity and consistency
• local visibility was fragmented
• brand presentation did not reflect professionalism
• governance and compliance were unclear
• decisions existed, but had no coherent form

Momentum was there — confidence was not.

3. THINK PHASE (What happened)

Think:
We clarified what truly needed to change before anything was built.

• Defined the position Bigness needed to hold in a competitive London market
• Distinguished essential foundations from unnecessary execution
• Mapped credibility, visibility, and structure as decision pillars
• Prioritised clarity over speed

Only after decisions were aligned did execution make sense.

4. OUTCOME (What changed)

Outcome:

• A clear and confident business position was established
• Digital presence aligned with trust and locality
• Governance and structure brought consistency to decisions
• The business moved from fragmented execution to deliberate direction

Execution became calmer because decisions were clear.

5. HUMAN VALIDATION

“Working with Zylaris Consulting transformed the way Bigness operates. Everything now works together — from structure and visibility to governance and credibility. We’re positioned as a serious competitor in the London market.”

— Constantin Iosif, Director, Bigness Group

6. CTA — Quiet Invitation

If this feels familiar, clarity is the right place to start.

Actions:

• Start with Think

• Or get in touch